Skip to main content
Question

Athlete limit increase — RunQuest (Client ID 229545)

  • June 15, 2026
  • 3 replies
  • 102 views

Forum|alt.badge.img+2

Hi,

Posting here to try to get some feedback on my athlete-limit increase form
(submitted April 29, then again June 1 following the Strava API changes).

 

What changed since the June 1 update: I self-upgraded to the 10-athlete
Standard Tier — and I'm already at capacity (9/10 connected), with ~150
users on a waitlist, ready to connect. The 10-athlete cap is now the only
thing holding back the public launch.

 

The app: RunQuest maps an athlete's Strava activities onto a grid of
unlockable territory squares (read-only, gamified running, France-only at
launch). The app is already live on Google Play and the App Store in France.

 

Compliance: read-only scopes, direct API calls from my own backend (no
third-party intermediary platform), compliant with brand guidelines
("Connect with Strava" button + Strava attribution on all data displays).
From my point of view, I meet all the requirements.

 

The ask: my form requested 2000. If a lower interim cap (e.g. 500) is
faster to approve, that works perfectly for me — I'd rather unblock the
current waitlist now and revisit later as growth justifies it. Last form
submitted June 1, Client ID 229545.

 

The silence since April 29 is really frustrating — I don't even know
whether the request is still being processed, especially as some people
seem to get a response within just a few days.

Hoping someone from Strava sees this forum.

Have a good day everyone,
Cédric

3 replies

Forum|alt.badge.img

Client ID: 211754                                                                                                                                                             

I submitted my extended tier request on June 2 and haven't heard back yet, so I wanted to add my voice here.                                                                  

My app is AI RunCoach — a personalized running coach that reads a user's Strava activity data and builds adaptive training plans around it. It's a single-user, read-only     

integration: the app only accesses data belonging to the authenticated user, with no social features, no leaderboards, and no data sharing.

I've gone through the API agreement carefully and built the app to be fully compliant. I'm not looking for anything beyond what the application describes — just confirmation that the use case is approved so I can continue building.                                                                        

If there's anything additional you need from me to move the review forward, I'm happy to provide it.


Forum|alt.badge.img+2
  • Author
  • Hub Rookie
  • June 17, 2026

Hi ​@Emily_A sorry to tag you directly, I can see you're active on the forum. 

Is there a way to see where form-based requests currently stand, and how
we can check the status of a submission? 

And another question: is a request for 999 athletes
handled the same way as a request for a higher number (e.g. 9999), or do
they go through different review paths ?

Thanks in advance for any help, and have a great day!

(For reference, my own submission: RunQuest, Client ID 229545, April 29 & June 1.)
 


Forum|alt.badge.img

Same story here, applied on 9th of may and silence since then...