Require heart rate data to qualify for leaderboards

[_JD_]

Unfortunately cheating on Strava segments seems to be fairly common. Suggestion for cycling activties is to require a heart rate monitor and power meter to an obtain a leaderboard ranking. For running, etc., require a heart rate monitor. At a minimum, a heart rate monitor for activites would be a step in the right direction. This would help maintain the integrity of Strava. Will it solve the problem, no. But the change would definitely help expose cheaters. 

[rosetto]

good, good idea and good compromise. Let's hope that Strava puts it into practice since the service is paid

then it's true that Strava could do much more to protect the performance of honest people

[PeterH]

@ARoger"I wonder why Strava cannot catch these people automatically. "

Well, it does seem to be very hard for them. The only solution I see is to have users filter the results, you can flag a ride, maybe add the option to flag a segment attempt?

I would prefer to see a required powermeter to qualify but I do understand that prices are steep for many. So make a heartrate monitor a minimum requirement but add a powermeter filter so users can filter the leaderboards themselves. You can also add a kom-category, 'powerKOM' or something like that to mark the fastest rider with a powermeter.

[rosetto]

good, very good. I agree with you 

[k1zmt]

I know it is absurd to require power meter but this is the only more-less reliable way to filter out cheaters.

Honestly, machine learning could be an efficient way to identify cheating but this would require a decent level of compute power. Reinforced learning by leveraging people feedback could really help here.

I think Strava went through rough waters lately, they have been laying off some stuff and raising prices so I could hardly imagine them doing anything significant to improve situation in segments.