Skip to main content

Hi everyone,

Strava’s competitive and athletic features attract cheaters and fraudsters. We constantly encounter cases where segments are completed using cars, motorcycles, e-bikes, and other tricks. What’s even more surprising is that Strava allows uploading any tracks, which are essentially text files with XML markup, without any validation.

To prove my point, here’s an example of a website that lets you “speed up” your own (or even someone else’s) track, making the result indistinguishable from a real activity: https://starva.duckdns.org/

Try it yourself and see—there’s no protection in place. Meanwhile, you’ve disabled FlyBy by default and keep cutting features in the free (non-subscription) version. Wouldn’t it make more sense to focus on tackling cheaters?

Oh, did you really post that. I can't believe my eyes.


Strava should sue that website for trademark infringement.


Strava should sue that website for trademark infringement.

 

I think it would be cheaper for them to buy this site along with the algorithm.

But the point is different - they don't care about protection against modifications at all.


@Yurixx What is you proposal how Strava should differentiate between original and manipulated files?


Reply