This is about Strava’s commitment to ethical and transparent data usage and skimming. I suggest setting up a royalty fund for all public facing accounts that get scraped thousands of times a day by AIS, by data brokers, health insurance companies, my own Strava data has been used in the court of law.
All the other social platforms pay their content creators. Strava for every minute spent on it one hour is spent exercising. To preserve that and scale ethically We need to set up a royalty fund and reimbursement for paying data contributors, unknowing, and knowing breaches beyond Strava’s control, Whether an account is public or not for advanced simulators and quantum computing to use probability in statistics to unencrypted personal health information and monetize it.
Transparency looks like setting up a fund and committing to Paying the “Vincent van Goghs” “ Artist “ , “ Primarily starving nonprofits” , “ People that can barely afford a membership.
A path towards payment for LLM’s to ethically buy data. Restoring power to the people and Separating Strava from other social media Platforms.
Honestly, I worry at any time I recommend this app to a female for the risk of them being stalked and or followed. I get my girlfriends to sign up and then I feel like it’s a courtesy of me to let my exes know where I am. For them to retain the right to their privacy and also highlight my visibility.
We can shape and change the narrative, Data is the new gold and there is no scarcity in the space. Just greed, The ability for a worker to retain data that can be used to show harm from employment is giving power back to the people.
Has anybody else thought along these lines where Strava doesn’t sell out but we pay out. Whoops, evaluation is based on the accuracy of their content