I had a period several years ago when I wasn't cleared to run, and so I hiked. Fast, because I had to take my frustration out somehow. So I sometimes have hiking segment records from that time "stolen" by people who have done a combination of hiking and running over an activity, but it's clear that most or all of the specific segment was run.
I maintain that such an activity should be called a run since some of it was run. But I'm getting some pushback on that. Am I out of line and I should just live with it? Or is there a policy I can point them at?
