Skip to main content

Did you know, you can use Strava's Relative Effort feature to analyze your efforts and intensity trends over time?  If you are a Strava Subscriber and collect heart rate data for your activities, you can take advantage of this feature.  


What is relative effort?  


Relative effort, or RE, measures how much cardiovascular work went into any activity.  You will see your relative effort score (a number) on your activity page on Strava. 



Why is this useful?


It allows you to track your intensity across sport types, and see how they add up over the week, as well as how they compare over multiple weeks.


What does that number really mean? Is higher always better?  


This can be pretty confusing, so let's look at a real life example of someone who benefits from using RE - me!



Up until a few years ago, my training focused almost exclusively on running and cycling. The metric I used to gauge my efforts was distance, and as a result I shied away from  non-distance based activities like yoga and HIIT. I ended up over training and got an injury that took months to heal.


I started cross training, and using RE on Strava to compare and track my efforts across a diverse set of activity types.  Take a look at my RE scores for the week of March 13th:


 



In this example, you can see that the run with the RE of 87 is the hardest workout I’ve done this week, followed by weight training with an RE of 37


The important thing to remember about RE is that it’s, as the name suggests, relative.  The number itself isn’t as meaningful as comparing those RE scores, to see where you’ve been putting in the hard efforts and where you’ve been taking it easier.  


Assuming most of us shouldn’t be working out at maximum effort all the time, a higher RE score isn’t necessarily better.  If you’re on a recovery day or week, you’ll be looking for those RE scores to be lower.


Are RE scores cumulative?


RE scores are cumulative and their total over a week makes up your Weekly Effort. If a week isn’t complete, you’ll see your total for the week so far.  Below is my weekly effort chart with a cumulative RE of 250 so far this week:




In addition to showing your weekly total, you’ll see a graph of previous weeks, so you can see how your RE totals are trending over time. 


Here’s a week where I was working out pretty hard:



Here’s what a recovery week looked like:



By giving you the data you need to make appropriate adjustments to your training routines, comparing your RE scores over time can help you avoid both over or under training, 


Frequently Asked Questions:  


Q: I didn’t record heart rate for one of my activities.  Can I still get an RE score?


A:  Yes - for activities without heart rate data, you can set your perceived exertion to get RE.


Q:  I did a very long endurance activity, and my RE score seems too low.  Why is this?


A:  In many cases, very long activities (think an 8 hour hike) are done at a lower intensity.  Since RE is calculated by how much time you spend in each of your heart rate zones, long activities spent in lower heart rate zones will have a much lower RE than shorter activities done in higher zones.  


Q:  Is there a way to see my hardest activities ever?  The ones with the highest RE scores?


A:  Yes - visit strava.com/athlete/training and sort your activities by RE.  Your hardest efforts will appear at the top and will be sorted in descending order.



What if I have more questions?


Drop us a reply below and we’ll be happy to help.


Already using relative effort?  Does it help you in your training and fitness?  We would love to hear your experience.


Is Strava calculating Relative Effort differently now from the past?  I have submitted a ticket for Strava to look into it, but, I use to average 200-300+ a week, and now find it hard to hit in the high 100s.  For example, here are three ride, one and two years apart, same route on Zwift:

Date       Route                   Dist          Time      Elev    Wght Pwr Work    Speed    Heart      Cadence  Ave Pwr

6/16/23 Road to the Sky  20.06mi  2:08:58  3481ft  179w        1327kj  9.3mph  130bpm   83           171w

1/4/23   Road to the Sky   20.32mi  2:10:13   3501ft   174w       1291kj  9.4mph   130bpm   86          165w

10/10/21 Road to Sky       20.04mi   2:10:50  3451ft   171w        1283kj 9.2mph   131bpm    79          163w

The 6/16 ride (today) has a relative effort or 36

1/4/23 has a relative effort of 86

10/10/21 has a relative effort of 91

Can someone explain this to me?


Did you change your heart rate zones setting?


I did alter them some.


Altering them even a little can have a huge effect. As per Janes explanations not the exact heart rate is used in the calculations, only the zone you were in. If your approximately 130 bpm is now in a zone lower than before that would lead to a much lower Relative Effort.


Hi,

similar question:

I have 2 similar bike exercises - one being longer with slightly higher average heart rate but same peak heart rate. Both have really different relative efforts 109 vs. 186. With 186 being the shorter one with slightly lower av. heart rate. Yes I changed the HR zone - but only slightly. so both exercises are still similar in their zones and actually the 109 with more time in the higher zones.

Please find them here. Looks counter-intuitive to me. Did you change the formula maybe between April and August?

 


Hi, I am using relative effort and finding it really helpful however my activities have stopped showing in the relative effort even though they are uploaded to my profile activity. Permissions still enable health data so not sure what has changed.

Can anybody advise please?

 


@ke11y29
Thanks for your post and sorry for any trouble you're having. Please submit a support ticket so our team can take look at your account and try to find out what's going on. 


Reply