First off, I am happy to see the big improvement in the automatic detection of impossible efforts across more activities. Specifically, I am seeing it a lot more for running where people who are posting activities with sub 4 min/mile paces are frequently being marked as having a problem. This is good and a great step forward from where things were.
However, there is still an issue. These activities that have been marked as auto-detected are still being listed in the challenge leaderboards. The top 20 of the 5k running challenge for example is almost all activities that have been marked with “We detected an issue with this activity”. Some of them are a week old and still showing on the leaderboard. Why aren’t those activities removed from the leaderboard immediately when they are detected? If the person ends up clearing up the issue, then the activity can be re-indexed onto the leaderboard, but in the meantime, they should be removed as soon as the system sees there is an obvious problem.
Hi
How do you reclaim wrongfully flagged activity? Not very confident of the algorithm yet. A quite steady pace club race (1 hour long) with roughly 41 kph has been flagged.. If it starts flagging those kind of activitie oh boy..
Sure, here’s the link: https://www.strava.com/activities/82892741
I’m astounded the Strava algorithms analyze 16 year old activities. As there is no heart rate or other sensor data in it (pretty normal for that time) in conjunction with the high average speed and no road or triathlon gear attached it seems to find that ride suspicious. I fear you have to ask the support to remove the flags.
Ok, thanks. I believe at a time this has been tracked with Sportstracker mobile app etc and exported to Strava. Didn’t know that 40 kph gets you flagged;)
I am wondering if it has to do with the elevation profile compared to the speeds. Was it really that hilly? There are a bunch of spots along the course that it shows you going 25-30 mph or even faster at locations with a grade of over 10%. It looks like they are just very short bits of the course, but could look off to a computer analysis. I’m wondering if there was some bad elevation data collected in the file and it is causing the analysis to think the speeds are unrealistic.
Reply
Login to the community
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.