[Known Issue] Surface type overview doesn't match what's shown in the elevation profile

Hey ​@dpazars,

Just following up, are you still experiencing this issue? 

​@Bryant Just checked again. Yes, the issue persists.

I see the same, whenever there are unspecified surface parts in the route the percentage of “unspecified” is exagerrated while the percentage of dirt and paved show too low values.

if i move the route slightly further, it goes to 100% unspecified, but it should be atleast 99% specified

Hey ​@dpazars,

Thank you for confirming.
I’ve just made my team aware of this issue. 
Once I receive an update, I’ll be sure to return to this thread.

Thank you so much for your cooperation.

When planning a route, I have noticed that the surface type percentages don’t add up to 100%.

For example, when editing this route, we see: “16% paved, 32% dirt, 13% not specified” (sum = 61% which is far off 100 so it’s not simple rounding error):

Moreover, the 16, 32, 13 are also directly used and likely abused in the visualization bar:

<div class="SurfaceTypeBreakdown_breakdown__t1AW6">

  <div class="SurfaceTypeBreakdown_paved__tNlV5" style="width:16%">

  </div><div class="SurfaceTypeBreakdown_unpaved__ZTUix" style="width:32%">

  </div><div class="SurfaceTypeBreakdown_unknown__ivRCF" style="width:13%">

</div></div>

Clearly, the the 16, 32, 13 proportionality is not being respected by the visualization. Even when playing around in console, it seems the full visualization bar assumes the sum of paved, dirt, and not specified will add up to >= 100.