Skip to main content
Solved

Segments minimal length


Forum|alt.badge.img+8

Why can't I create segments shorter than 500 meters for cycling and shorter than 300 meters for running, even though I have a subscription, when I've seen shorter segments on Strava?

For example this running segment is only 280 meters long: https://www.strava.com/segments/19339033

Best answer by anchskier

Originally, the minimum length for a segment was much shorter.  After a while, they realized that short segments were problematic because the accuracy of GPS units and recording wasn't good enough to accurately track times over short distances.  With short segments, there are only a few data points and if one or two of those are a little off, it makes the results totally wrong.  So, eventually, they changed the minimum length of a segment that you could create, but they left the short ones that were already in the system which is why you will still see some that are shorter than anything you could create today.

View original
Did this topic help you find an answer to your question?

5 replies

anchskier
Superuser
Forum|alt.badge.img+28
  • Superuser
  • 608 replies
  • Answer
  • May 8, 2024

Originally, the minimum length for a segment was much shorter.  After a while, they realized that short segments were problematic because the accuracy of GPS units and recording wasn't good enough to accurately track times over short distances.  With short segments, there are only a few data points and if one or two of those are a little off, it makes the results totally wrong.  So, eventually, they changed the minimum length of a segment that you could create, but they left the short ones that were already in the system which is why you will still see some that are shorter than anything you could create today.


Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Hub Starter
  • 1 reply
  • June 10, 2024

It's a bummer.  I have an extremely steep 200m climb but can't create a run segment on it.  


Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • Hub Starter
  • 1 reply
  • June 11, 2024

If a segment is private, it shouldn't have these restrictions, as it's for reference only.


Forum|alt.badge.img+2
  • Hub Rookie
  • 4 replies
  • August 13, 2024

GPS is much more accurate these days, especially if you have multiband GPS. When I first started using Strava, my GPS devices gave very crude GPS tracks, especially when in forests etc whereas now I get very clean and precise tracks. Why are we still setting standards based on old GPS tech? Also why does Strava only look at the start and end points of the track and nothing in between? I often ride at bike parks where there might be 5 or 6 trails all starting at the same point and ending at the same point but they are distinct trails and yet Strava cannot determine which one I was on. On the map it even shows the trails and my GPS line almost perfectly lines up with the trail and yet Strava still thinks I did the trail beside it which does not line up with my GPS track at all, except for the start and end points. I can't wait for another company to come along and Show Strava how it should be done. They are resting on their laurels. 


Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • Hub Rookie
  • 3 replies
  • January 4, 2025
anchskier wrote:

With short segments, there are only a few data points and if one or two of those are a little off, it makes the results totally wrong.

will have plenty of data points climbing a 100 meters segment with 15% gradient

 


Reply


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept, you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings